Daily Signal - Media drives radical wokeness
But where is all of this coming from?
An in-depth analysis at Tablet magazine from Zach Goldberg, a doctoral candidate in political science at Georgia State University, shows that at the very least, Americaâs most elite media institutions have been the conduit for these ideas to become ubiquitous.
Once obscure academic jargon like âwhite privilegeâ and âmicroaggression,â Goldberg notes in his Aug. 4 piece, has been picked up by liberal journalists while the word âracismâ has been redefined.
As I wrote in my analysis of Ibram X. Kendi, Robin DiAngelo, and the âanti-racistâ movement, racism is ânot just an individual act of discrimination or prejudice toward a person or a people based on their race.â
Instead, racism is a âcollective condition leading to inequities in society.â
Being racially colorblind or demanding equal treatment under the law now are considered racist if societal inequities persist.
In his Tablet piece, Goldberg lays out just how rapidly and widely âwokenessâ has been disseminated among Americans. The chief culprit being media, more specifically elite media institutions such as The New York Times and The Washington Post.
That process accelerated over the summer, Goldberg writes, as countless articles in these elite publications, typically portrayed as straight news, âillustrate a prevailing new political morality on questions of race and justice that has taken power at the Times and Postâa worldview sometimes abbreviated as âwokenessâ that combines the sensibilities of highly educated and hyperliberal white professionals with elements of Black nationalism and academic critical race theory.â
âWokenessâ is a term most Americans were mostly unfamiliar with even a few years ago, but now its prevailing ideas are everywhere. Wokeness, which combines elements of Marxist ideology and critical race theory, increasingly has become the dominant ethos of Americaâs higher education institutions, newsrooms, and boardrooms.
To those who may think that coverage of race and racism revived after the election of President Donald Trump in 2016, Goldbergâs analysis shows that this surge actually began years earlier, coinciding more closely with the beginning of President Barack Obamaâs second term in office in 2013.
âIn 2011, the terms racist/racists/racism accounted for 0.0027% and 0.0029% of all words in The New York Times and The Washington Post, respectively,â Goldberg writes, adding:
No comments:
Post a Comment